This podcast was created entirely using AI and other software technologies, including AI-generated voices. The content is drawn from actual video and audio of the Zoning Board meeting, which has been summarized to highlight key points.
The goal of this podcast is to help busy citizens of Saratoga Springs stay informed and engaged in our democratic process by providing accessible meeting summaries.
You can view the full video of the meeting here: https://saratogaspringsny.new.swagit.com/videos/346449
In addition to the audio podcast, we’ve also added a new feature, aided by AI, to provide the following summary of projects reviewed during the meeting:
126 West Ave, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866: An 18-month extension for previously granted variances for a mixed-use development . The plan remains unchanged. Decision: Motion passed unanimously. Public Comment: No public comments.
134 Crescent Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866: Area variance for rear setback to connect detached garage to existing single-family residence. District requires 25 feet; proposed is 23.4 feet (relief of 1.6 feet). Decision: No Decision. Public Comment: No public comments. Public comment period remains open.
65 Phila Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866: Variance for combined coverage for addition to existing single-family residence and detached garage. Required 40%; requesting 51% (relief of 11%). Decision: Design Review Board advisory opinion requested. Public Comment Summary:
Andy Williams (14 Lafayette Street): Objected to the size of the proposed plan, stating it is too much and threatens the neighborhoo d character. Expressed concern about the accuracy of the applicant's representation of the building's proximity to the property line. Raised concerns about stormwater runoff and the impact on trees.
Samantha Bosshart (Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation): Supported the project, stating that the proposed height, mass, and sca le are acceptable and consistent with the National Park Service Design Rehabilitation Standards. Emphasized the importance of finding a buyer committed to the preservation covenant.
Leslie LeBon (14 Lafayette Street): Requested denial of the lot coverage variance, arguing that the proposal can be achieved by reducing the building pads and square footage. Raised concerns about the impact on the physical and environmental conditions of the neighborhood.
Pam Foonichello (116 Circular Street): Expressed concerns about rainwater runoff and snow removal, urging the applicant to consider these factors in their plans.
Joe (69 Phila Street): Voiced support for the project, noting the presence of other garage structures in the area.
Sue Davis (STA/LEA Architecture): Supported the project, citing the history of development on the property and the potential for a successful outcome.
Public comment period remains open.
3 Second Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866: Area Variance for Addition to Single-Family Residence in UR1 District. Maximum combined coverage: Required 28%; proposed 32% (relief of 4%). Rear setback: Required 30 feet; proposed 24 feet (relief of 6 feet). A modest sunroom addition to the back of the property. Decision: No Decision. Public Comment: No public comments. Public comment period remains open.
35 Ash Street, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866: Area Variance for Two-Family Dwelling in UR3 District. Minimum lot size: Required 8,000 sq uare feet; proposed 6,272 square feet (relief of 1,728 square feet). Minimum average lot width: Required 80 feet; proposed 43.6 feet (relief of 36.4 feet). Construction of a two-family dwelling with an in-law apartment in the basement. Decision: No Decision. Public Comment: No public comments. Public comment period remains open.
These updates have also been added to the Saratoga Civic Pulse “Shaping Our City” Interactive Map, which gives you real-time insight into projects reviewed by the Saratoga Springs Planning Board, Design Review Commission, and Zoning Board of Appeals.
Share this post